[Skip to Content]
Banner
Menu
  • Home
  • My Account
  • Submit an Abstract
  • Submission Guidelines
    • Abstract Submission Guidelines
    • Trial-in-Progress Submission Guidelines
  • Home
  • Society of Urologic Oncology 26th Annual Meeting Gallery
  • MYPROSTATESCORE 2.0 URINE TEST ACCURATELY DETERMINES THE NEED FOR BIOPSY IN PATIENTS ON ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE FOR GRADE GROUP 1 PROSTATE CANCER

Introduction:

Previous biomarker tests have failed to accurately predict upgrading in patients on active surveillance (AS) for low-risk prostate cancer. The 18-gene MyProstateScore 2.0 (MPS2) assay includes markers specifically overexpressed in high-grade relative to low-grade cancers, providing biologic rationale for potential effectiveness in AS. Using the MPS2 urinary testing panel, we developed and validated a novel testing model (MPS2-AS) to predict upgrading to GG≥3 PCa in patients with GG1 disease undergoing AS.

Methods:

A novel MPS2-AS testing model was established using the 18 MPS2 genes in a University of Michigan development cohort (2008-2020). The model was validated in a multi-center cohort of patients undergoing AS for GG1 disease. All patients underwent multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) followed by systematic 12-core transrectal or transperineal biopsy, and patients with PI-RADS ≥3 lesions underwent additional targeted biopsies. First-catch (non-DRE) urine was collected at the time of surveillance biopsy for MPS2-AS testing. Because some patients with GG2 remain candidates for AS, the primary study outcome was significant upgrading to GG≥3 PCa on AS biopsy. Test performance measures and the clinical consequences (upgrading events detected, unnecessary biopsies avoided) of using MPS2-AS, MRI, or the PCPT risk calculator to determine the need for biopsy were calculated and compared.

Results:

The external validation cohort included 223 patients undergoing AS at one of nine urology clinics (3 academic, 6 non-academic) for an existing diagnosis of GG1 PCa. Median patient age was 68 years (IQR 63-73), median PSA was 7.2 ng/ml (4.4-9.2), and 142 (64%) patients had a positive pre-biopsy MRI (PI-RADS≥3). Overall, 84 patients (38%) had GG≥2 cancer and 20 (9.0%) had GG≥3 cancer on AS biopsy. Considering detection of GG≥3 as a primary aim of surveillance biopsies, use of MPS2-AS to determine the need for biopsy would have avoided 70% of unnecessary AS biopsies while detecting 95% of GG≥3 cancers. By contrast, use of PI-RADS ≥3 to determine the need for biopsy would have avoided 48% of unnecessary AS biopsies while capturing only 79% of GG≥3 cancers. Use of the PCPT risk calculator would have avoided 16% of unnecessary biopsies while capturing 95% of GG≥3 cancers.

Conclusion:

In this ongoing, prospective, multi-center study of patients undergoing AS for GG1 PCa, we found that use of a novel non-DRE urine test (MPS2-AS) to determine the need for AS biopsy appears to provide favorable clinical outcomes compared to MRI and PSA-based testing. Importantly, MPS2-AS provided actionable rule-out testing that would allow patients to forego more than two-thirds of unnecessary AS biopsies. While further validation is needed, these findings suggest MPS2-AS could be used to guide a non-invasive approach to monitoring, reduce the need for scheduled surveillance biopsies, and preserve the use of MRI for optimizing the yield of biopsies in higher-risk patients.

Funding: N/a

 

Image(s) (click to enlarge):



MYPROSTATESCORE 2.0 URINE TEST ACCURATELY DETERMINES THE NEED FOR BIOPSY IN PATIENTS ON ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE FOR GRADE GROUP 1 PROSTATE CANCER

Category

Prostate Cancer > Potentially Localized

Description

Custom JS

double-click to edit, do not edit in source

Poster #180



Presented By: Cameron J Britton

Authors:

Cameron J Britton

Kent Chevli

Walter Rayford

Adam J. Gadzinski

Jean V. Joseph

Pratik Patel

Ali Kasraeian

Prithipal S. Sethi

Keavash D. Assani

Janene Pierce

Kristen R. Scarpato

Daniel A. Barocas

Javed Siddiqui

John T. Wei

Udit Singhal

Simpa S. Salami

Todd M. Morgan

Ganesh S. Palapattu

Jacob I. Meyers

Arul M. Chinnaiyan

Jeffrey J. Tosoian

© 2023 Society of Urologic Oncology